Hey! Are You Trying To Get Sued?!

Oh, my babies.  I'm here to tell you a harrowing tale.  Well, maybe not a harrowing tale, but notably painful, as my butt hurts from all the sitting and researching I've been doing on the subject of using other's work, namely images, on your site.

It all started with this post: Blogger Beware: You CAN Get Sued For Using Photos You Don't Own on Your Blog.

Go on. Go read it. We'll wait here while you scare the daylights out of yourself.

Hey! Are You Trying To Get Sued?!

Cliff's Notes:

* If you're using images that aren't your original work, you might be at risk of copyright infringement.

* Using a disclaimer on your site/blog about the images you took from any source, does not give you immunity from the law.

* Agreeing that the copyright remains with the owner of the images (even by disclaimer) is not a safe practice.

* It doesn't matter if you reposted the image with no malice or intent, IE innocently.

* I think, but I'm not sure, that since the time the article was originally published ( a couple of years back), Pinterest's rules have changed.  Someone want to weigh in?

~GULP~

After I read the article, and then clicked into the other articles, growing more enlightened with each page, I started doing extensive research on my own.  The resounding evidence I found: I might be infringing on someone's work.

ME!  INFRINGING!

~faint~

Listen, as a writer, nothing makes me crankier than to have someone use my work as their own. You know, without credit. Writer's see a well-written article and understand the work that went into such a thing.  Writing is hard work, yo.  This one fact, makes me hyper-aware and respectful of the hard work of other writers and, by extension, photographers.

After ALL THE WORDS had been read, my head was spinning, but I knew what I had to do: I had to go through each and every post/image on my site (over a year's worth) and re-research each image to the source to make doubly sure I wasn't doing something I shouldn't.

I spent three days, 8 hours each day, butt in chair, doing my homework.  With each image that got the all-clear, my confidence grew that I had known what I was doing all along. Until...

...my inbox dinged with the very polite, very understanding, very sweet message that I had stolen two pics and could I be a peach and unsteal them?

To say the blood drained out of my head and a chill settled in my chest, is not overstating my physical reaction after I had been so, so, so careful to do the right thing.

The woman whose photos I had inadvertently lifted (I checked twice, just for good measure, and still got it wrong) was incredibly kind to me.  She asked me to remove them, which I promptly did, and pointed me to a stock house where I could buy pics for about a buck a shot.

I was horrified and embarrassed, yet thankful she was understanding.  After I told her I had taken them down, and apologized again, she thanked me for being so nice about it.

No, no, no....thank you!

Not long after that conversation, I made the decision to only use my original work or stock that I buy.

I sat, butt in chair, for 12-hours on that last day.  I felt nothing was more important than setting my site right, which meant taking down all the images that weren't mine.  Not only on my OMT! site, but on all my social media.  Holy crap.  So much work.

The next bleary-eyed morning, my site/s looked like small bombs had gone off...OMT, where are some of your images?!  I told myself that it was a new day.  No use crying about the unexpected bumps in the site-building road, just get to work fixing what I could.

Later that morning, feeling like I had my shit handled, I spoke to a wonderful friend who happens to be a lawyer.  I recounted my story and told her about my new rule of only using original work/stock photos.  She sent this chilling gem my way:

* There's not even a guarantee that you'll be safe using stock photography. I had a lawyer friend who works for a company call me to ask me what to do, the company had paid a graphic designer to do their web page, and the dude had used stock photos, and turned out, the site licensing them didn't even have the right to do so!

Two things:

1) Note to self: you now have permission to crack in half.

2) Everyone should have a lawyer friend that says dude, especially a badass gurl lawyer.  Shout, J!

My new new rule is this: Only my images/graphics get to grace my site.  Mrs. Tucker wants to sleep at night; this should do it.

I belong to two facebook groups of bloggers, where we talk about and share all things bloggy, and it's interesting to see the responses to this issue.  Each group has someone that knows someone (or themselves) that have either been threatened with a lawsuit or had to get lawyers involved.  Before doing my research, I would have never suspected this issue to be so prevalent.

Dear bloggy/site-building friends, let this be a cautionary tale from me to you: even if other bloggers are putting disclaimers on their site, even if all your well-meaning blogging friends tell you it's OK, even if you do your due diligence, even if you think your chances are slim-to-none to getting caught, even if you spend hours with butt in chair going through all your images, double-checking to make sure you aren't violating the copyright...you still might be.

Horrible, but true.

Like the gal who wrote the article linked above, OMT! is not a lawyer and this should not be considered legal advice.

Consider it sound business advice.  The benefit of using an image you love that doesn't belong to you, does not outweigh the risk of running afoul of the law. Period.

Unless you're just trying to get sued.

 

 

 

 

Share It!

62 Comments

  1. Wow thank you so much for sharing and yep it totally scares the pants off of me. I'm now going to go threw my post and double check everything.
    Thanks
    Emily

  2. It frightens me too. I only use my own photos. I once received an email to remove a Pinterest pin...o gosh, is that not even safe?

    1. That's why I even went thru my social media. I was grateful I "only" had a year of stuff to sort.

      My biggest shock came from the stock photo issue, which is why only my images will be used.

  3. Great information! As a published free lance designer, I am appalled at the cavalier way bloggers use the original work of others as a basis for their own posts. One copied and pasted an entire set of directions, patterns included, for a craft, claiming it was "okay" because the origin was from an "old" book (1980s). Others think it's fine to take a Disney theme, create party decorations and publish those. The ones that bother me the most are those who disclaim - "if this is your work, just email me and I will take it down." Are you kidding me? Now there's a thief who should be sued!

    1. Oy. I have actually seen that disclaimer and have ~fainted~ thought, HOLY SHIT! No really, that's what I thought. Talk about an invitation...

      All last week, while rechecking my images, I was thinking I had done things correctly by license agreements and I was mistaken. I learned it's so easy to infringe, so in order to sleep at night and know I'm not unintentionally thievin', I'm going with my own stuff.

      Thanks for the thoughts.

  4. {sigh} so much to learn. I usually only use sites that allow you to give credit to the author but that doesn't sound safe now either. 🙁

    1. Angela: That was my thought, but for me...and this is a personal preference...I'm sticking with my own work for peace of mind. Many others use stock photos that they purchase or where the license agreement is for sharing. I just wanted folks to be aware, either way.

  5. Holy Crap! Yup! And Amen! Its a scary world, this blogging world we live and work in! I think I'm gonna follow you and only use my own images unless I have the written consent of the actual image owner... No law suits for me baby!

  6. I remember reading that article some time ago and sharing it with a couple of bloggers who I was concerned could end up in legal trouble. The advantage of having a personal site is that all my photos are my own. AND for me if I post a picture of some other child on AmaraLand, I make sure I have written permission first! If I don't then I blur the person's face! Just stopping by from the GRAND Social.

    1. I love that you took the time to share with bloggers you were concerned with. We're a special group, aren't we?

  7. Wow, that's scary that there's not even a guarantee that stock photos are not infringing. Yikes! Great read!! It's definitely a good reminder and why I prefer my own images, lol.

    1. The stock image story was the one that sent me over the edge...only my stuff from now on! Thanks for joining the convo.

  8. I actually started as a photoblogger, so this was a huge issue when I was first starting out (but from the other side as Pinterest terms claimed that any "pinned" image transferred ownership to *them*). Thankfully, I never saw any of my images being poached, but now that I use pics of my girls in my posts, it does make me somewhat wary.

    1. We have to stay on top of all things bloggy/site-y. I know Pinterest changed some of their terms, but not sure which ones (it was before I joined and I only hear talk of it).

  9. Holy moly! Thanks so much for the warning! Now I need to go through my site and find any pictures that aren't mine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.